Credit: ProjectKnow
|
The legal system is often archaic in its approach to crime. It is slow to adapt, simply because of “equality.” We built the system on the idea that criminals who commit the same crime should be treated the same, even if they did so for different reasons. We believe that it is fair to disregard the person out of fear that some will receive special treatment, and focus on crime, which is static and easier to judge.
Our approach, and its failure, is seen in mental illness, particularly
drug addiction. However, I believe we are changing, slowly but surely.
Brian’s case proves this. He was given the option to
complete a one-year rehabilitation program instead of being sentenced to five
years in jail. The program allowed him to end his addiction and reconnect with
his family.
I understand that not every drug addict will complete this
program, but Brian is proof that some addicts need a little push. This push
would not be found in prison.
To ensure the programs aren’t being taken advantage of, if
the addict violates the conditions of the program, he is usually given the
sentence he would have originally received. There are many options available to
substance abusers allowing them the best possible chances to end their
dependency.
It’s also cheaper: The Crime & Delinquency report found that if just 10% of eligible offenders were treated in community-based programs instead prison, the criminal justice system would save $4.8 billion. If 40% of eligible offenders received treatment, the savings would total $12.9 billion.
And more effective.
And more effective.
I have long been a proponent of rehabilitation instead of
imprisonment. It allows addicts to get the help they need, especially because
many didn’t have access to rehabilitation prior to their conviction. And it
removes the responsibility from the state. No longer can prisons be held
responsible for addicts and keeping them clean, despite the prevalence of drugs
in prisons. Now it is up to the individual to change.
No comments:
Post a Comment